kodak luma 350 vs Kodak Luma 450 – Blog

kodak luma 350 vs Kodak Luma 450: The Kodak Luma 350 and 450 are two of the best projectors Kodak has ever done, and we’re going to take a closer look at them today. These cutting-edge gadgets are supposed to revolutionize the way we interact with images by putting an exciting, interactive experience in the palm of your hand. The Luma 350 and Luma 450 offer to take your visual experience to the next level, whether you’re a casual moviegoer, a seasoned presenter or an aspiring artist.

We invite you to read this page as we highlight the differences and similarities between the Kodak Luma 350 and 450 projectors. At the conclusion, you will have a better idea of which projector would best meet your needs, and you will be one step closer to realize your full creative potential in the realm of visual expression.

KODAK Luma 350 Portable Smart Projector
1,826 Reviews
KODAK Luma 350 Portable Smart Projector
  • Special Feature: Built-In Speaker, Portable
  • Very Affordable Price, Video Playtime is up to 90 Minutes
  • Speaker 1W*2
Kodak Luma 450 Portable Full HD Smart Projector
  • This Model has Extra Features
  • Brightness : 200 ANSI lumen
  • Battery : 10500 mAh (Large Battery)
kodak luma 350 vs Kodak Luma 450

A brief overview of the key similarities and differences.

Which is Most Popular: When it comes to Compact Smart Projectors, the Kodak Luma 350 stands out as a beloved choice among consumers. Its popularity on Amazon says volumes about its amazing performance, small design, and innovative features that havegrabbed the hearts of projector aficionados worldwide.

Weight: When considering the weight element, the Kodak Luma 450 takes the lead as a very lightweight alternative, topping the scales at a modest one-pound. In comparison, the Kodak Luma 350 weighs somewhat more, with a still remarkable portable weight of 1.81 pounds. Despite this slight difference, both projectors remain incredibly useful for those seeking seamless mobility without sacrificing on performance.

Brightness: When it comes to brightness, the Kodak Luma 450 takes a  little advantage over its predecessor. With an output of 200 ANSI lumens, it produces rich and brillant pictures, even in well-lit areas. On the other side, the Kodak Luma 350 sports a noteworthy brightness of 150 ANSI lumens, providing great picture quality and clarity, but somewhat lower than the Luma 450. Whether you’re watching movies, presenting slides, or showing your artwork, both projectors excel in creating fascinating pictures that capture attention and enhance your entire viewing experience.

When it comes to battery capacity, the Kodak Luma 450 provides an amazing 10500 mAh batteries, giving extended usage time for uninterrupted projection sessions. On the other hand, the Kodak Luma 350 comes with a still decent 7500 mAh batteries, offering dependable power to fuel your creative pursuits. While the Luma 450’s bigger batteries capacity may give a tiny edge in terms of longer usage, both projectors provide enough batteries life to enjoy immersive presentations without worrying about running out of power.

Price: In compared to the more pricey Kodak Luma 450, the cheaper Luma 350 is a budget-friendly option that doesn’t compromise on quality or functionality.

Similarities: Both the Kodak Luma 350 and 450 share a multitude of fantastic features, making them remarkable projectors in their own way. With HDMI, USB, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi and wireless capabilities, both models offer smooth connectivity choices to enhance your projection experience. Additionally, they boast useful features such as Keystone correction for quick setup and different screen mirroring solutions including Airplay and Miracast. Moreover, with 1W*2 speakers and the capacity to project images varying from 5 to 150 inches in size, these projectors give immersive audiovisual experiences that appeal to a range of viewing tastes.

Play Time: When it comes to video playback time, both the Kodak Luma 350 and Luma 450 cameras provide an maximum length of 90 minutes. However, by employing the eco mode, users may extend the playback duration to up to 3 hours, providing extended shooting sessions without worrying about batteries.

Resolution: The Kodak Luma 350 offers a resolution of 854 × 480 ( 169), giving clear and vivid pictures for an engaging viewing experience. On the other hand, the Kodak Luma 450 takes image quality to the next level with its amazing resolution of 1920 × 1080 ( 16:9, FHD), offering wonderfully sharp and vivid visuals with remarkable clarity and depth. Whether you’re viewing movies, showing images, or presenting content, both projectors create a visual feast that brings your content to life in astonishing detail.

Dimension: Both the Kodak Luma 350 and Luma 450 have identical tiny dimensions, measuring 3.1 × 3.1 × 0.87 inches. This tiny size makes them handy to carry and store, letting you to effortlessly slide them into your purse or pocket for on-the-go consumption. The regular dimensions of these projectors ensure that you may enjoy their impressive projection capabilities without compromising on mobility or space efficiency.


kodak luma 350 vs Kodak Luma 450
Brandkodak luma 350Kodak Luma 450
Buy on AmazonBuy on Amazon
Video PlaytimeUp to 90 Minutes 90 Minutes (Up To 3 Hours When Eco Mode)
Audio Out 3.5 mm port, External BT3.5 mm port, External BT 4.0
Resolution 854x480p (16:9)1920x1080p (16:9, FHD )
Brightness 150 ANSI lumen200 ANSI lumen
Battery7500 mAh10500 mAh
Audio Sensitivity 28 dB29 dB
Keystone correction YesYes
Screen MirroringAirplay, MiracastAirplay, Miracast
Connectivity HDMI, USB, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, WirelessHDMI, USB, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, Wireless
Speaker Type Built-InBuilt-In
Projection Size5-150 inches5-150 inches
Item Weight1.81 Pounds1 Pounds
Product Dimensions3.1 x 3.1 x 0.87 inches3.1 x 3.1 x 0.87 inches
Most Popular Questions About: kodak luma 350 vs Kodak Luma 450
kodak luma 350 vs Kodak Luma 450: Reddit Answers

1.Yeah… AFAIK Kodak is a legitimate brand anymore, it is simply a name that you can get the rights to plaster on any junk you want. Fwiw, I’ve had an anker portable projector since 2018 that is still running strong. They are more pricey than I’d like, but they blow away all the cheap junk out there that I’ve seen lately. If you don’t need anything so portable, there are a number of alternative solutions out there.