Waterpik 660 vs WaterPik 100 – BLOG

Waterpik 660 vs WaterPik 100: Do you want to find the best water flosser? Stop looking! Here, we’ll take a deep dive into the competition between the Waterpik 660 and 100 versions.

Water Flossing Tips: 7
LED Function indicator/ Timer/Pacer/ Massage Mode: Yes
Classic Flossing: 3 (JT-100E)
Color Available: 6

Water Flossing Tips: 6
LED Function indicator/ Timer/Pacer/ Massage Mode: NO
Classic Flossing: 2 (JT-100E)
Color Available: 4

Learn about the features, benefits, and drawbacks of these two top-rated water flossers so you can make a well-informed selection. Put away your floss, and welcome to a healthier, brighter smile!

A brief overview of the key similarities and differences.

Weight: Though it may seem inconsequential, the Waterpik 660’s lighter weight of 1.46 pounds compared to the Waterpik 100’s heavier weight of 1.9 pounds may affect your decision.
Dimension: The Waterpik 100 has dimensions of 9.02 by 6.69 by 5.51 inches, making it slightly bigger than the Waterpik 660 (3.8 by 4.7 by 10.3 inches). If you’re limited on cabinet or counter space, this distinction might be crucial.

Included Accessories: The Waterpik 660 offers the most included accessories (seven when you count the tips), while the Waterpik 100 offers the fewest (six when you count the tips). This difference can be very important to you.

Similarities: It’s important to remember that the Waterpik 660 has features that the Waterpik 100 doesn’t have when comparing the two models. Particularly advantageous to the user experience and dental hygiene routine is the 660 model’s inclusion of a massage mode, an LED function indication, and a timer/pacer. For individuals looking for a more sophisticated and adaptable water flosser, these added bonuses may sway their decision in favor of the Waterpik 660.

Popular: If you compare the Waterpik 660 to the Waterpik 100, you’ll see that the former is the more popular model. The Waterpik 660 has quickly become the go-to option for those in need of a reliable and effective dental hygiene solution because to its high quality of performance, extensive set of functions, and overwhelmingly excellent customer ratings.

Colors: The Waterpik 660 comes in not one but six beautiful color variants, giving customers a wide selection of options to choose from. The color options for the Waterpik 100 are fewer, with just four distinct hues available.

Flossing Modes: The Waterpik 660 has an advantage in adaptability due to its three traditional flossing modes, each of which can be adjusted to suit the user’s demands and amount of tooth sensitivity. The Waterpik 660 is a better solution for consumers who want more flossing modes than what the Waterpik 100 provides.

Price: When compared to the more expensive Waterpik 660, the Waterpik 100 is an affordable choice. The Waterpik 100 is an easily available and reasonably priced option for individuals who want to maintain good dental health without sacrificing their budget.

Waterpik 660 vs Waterpik 100
Buy on AmazonBuy on Amazon
Color (D)6 Colors4 Colors
Water Flossing Tips (D)76
LED Function Indicator
Massage Mode
Classic Flossing3 (JT-100E)2(JT-100E)
Special Feature10 Pressure Settings10 Pressure Settings
Power SourceCorded ElectricCorded Electric
Item Weight1.46 Pounds1.9 Pounds
Dimensions3.8 x 4.7 x 10.3 Inches9.02 x 6.69 x 5.51 Inches
Most Popular Questions About: Waterpik 660 vs WaterPik 100
Waterpik 660 vs WaterPik 100 Reddit Answers

1. I purchased a Waterpik Ultra PRO WP-660, and I must admit that I’m pretty happy I did because it has a sizable reservoir. The cost is often somewhat greater, and it might not be the best option if your bathroom doesn’t have a free outlet. But it’s incredibly good to be able to visit the town for a while. I can’t imagine having a smaller reservoir because I usually utilize the whole one in full burst mode (rather than intermittent bursts).


2. The coolest thing ever is a Waterpik WP-100 that I own. It still functions beautifully after almost five years of ownership. I once had to replace the hose, but it was simple and inexpensive to locate the component.